This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2010-07 New Draft Document Published (Ambiguity cleanup on IPv6 Address Space Policy for IXP)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2010-07 New Draft Document Published (Ambiguity cleanup on IPv6 Address Space Policy for IXP)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2010-07 New Draft Document Published (Ambiguity cleanup on IPv6 Address Space Policy for IXP)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
sander at steffann.nl
Thu Dec 16 23:53:37 CET 2010
Hi James, > On 16 December 2010 16:08, Emilio Madaio <emadaio at ripe.net> wrote: >> We encourage you to read the draft document text and send any comments >> to address-policy-wg at ripe.net before 13 January 2011. > > I thought the consensus was to use 'published' rather than 'clear' I think you are correct. 'Published' is also much easier to verify for the IPRA's than 'clear'. Unfortunately the webcasts are not available online yet, but IIRC there was agreement to use 'published'. Does anybody remember differently? Thanks, Sander
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2010-07 New Draft Document Published (Ambiguity cleanup on IPv6 Address Space Policy for IXP)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2010-07 New Draft Document Published (Ambiguity cleanup on IPv6 Address Space Policy for IXP)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]