This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2010-05 New Policy Proposal (Global Policy for IPv4 Allocation by the IANA post exhaustion)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2010-05 New Policy Proposal (Global Policy for IPv4 Allocation by the IANA post exhaustion)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2010-05 New Policy Proposal (Global Policy for IPv4 Allocation by the IANA post exhaustion)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Leo Vegoda
leo.vegoda at icann.org
Tue Aug 31 18:41:44 CEST 2010
On 30 Aug 2010, at 2:57, Leo Vegoda wrote: [...] >> I take this to mean that the authors original assumption is correct >> and that as things sit today, IANA will have no IPv4 addresses >> remaining immediately following IPv4 exhaustion. The Reclamation Pool >> will therefor only contain addresses returned to the IANA. > > Yes, as things stand now, that's right. I should probably add a clarification to my previous note. Once those five /8s have been allocated to RIRs we won't have any unallocated unicast /8s. But we will still be managing the multicast space, and various IETF assigned blocks for registries like the IANA IPv4 Special Purpose Address Registry: http://www.iana.org/assignments/iana-ipv4-special-registry/iana-ipv4-special-registry.xhtml Regards, Leo Vegoda
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2010-05 New Policy Proposal (Global Policy for IPv4 Allocation by the IANA post exhaustion)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2010-05 New Policy Proposal (Global Policy for IPv4 Allocation by the IANA post exhaustion)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]