This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2010-05 New Policy Proposal (Global Policy for IPv4 Allocation by the IANA post exhaustion)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2010-05 New Policy Proposal (Global Policy for IPv4 Allocation by the IANA post exhaustion)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2010-05 New Policy Proposal (Global Policy for IPv4 Allocation by the IANA post exhaustion)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Leo Vegoda
leo.vegoda at icann.org
Mon Aug 30 23:57:51 CEST 2010
On 30 Aug 2010, at 2:42, Chris Grundemann wrote: [...] >> Yes, the RIRs agreed a split for the old "Various Registries" space between themselves. They wrote to us about it in 2008 and a copy of the message and the breakdown is published on the ICANN web site: >> >> http://www.icann.org/correspondence/wilson-to-conrad-28jan08-en.pdf > > Thank you Leo! That was the missing link. > > I take this to mean that the authors original assumption is correct > and that as things sit today, IANA will have no IPv4 addresses > remaining immediately following IPv4 exhaustion. The Reclamation Pool > will therefor only contain addresses returned to the IANA. Yes, as things stand now, that's right. Regards, Leo
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2010-05 New Policy Proposal (Global Policy for IPv4 Allocation by the IANA post exhaustion)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2010-05 New Policy Proposal (Global Policy for IPv4 Allocation by the IANA post exhaustion)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]