This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2010-02 New Policy Proposal (Allocations from the last /8)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2010-02 New Policy Proposal (Allocations from the last /8)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2010-02 New Policy Proposal (Allocations from the last /8)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Niall O'Reilly
Niall.oReilly at ucd.ie
Fri Apr 16 09:41:47 CEST 2010
On 16/04/10 00:49, Philip Smith wrote: > Hi James, > > James Blessing said the following on 13/04/10 23:54 : [...] >> 3. Final Exhaustion >> >> In the event that the unforeseen circumstances pool /16 remains unused >> in the time the final /8 covered by this policy has been distributed, a >> /15 will be returned to the main pool to be distributed as per clause 2. >> >> Once this /15 has been used then the final /15 will also be returned to >> the pool s should an unforeseen usage have not been found. > > I think you mean /16 here, right? I expect he meant /17 (half of the /16). /Niall
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2010-02 New Policy Proposal (Allocations from the last /8)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2010-02 New Policy Proposal (Allocations from the last /8)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]