This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2010-02 New Policy Proposal (Allocations from the last /8)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2010-02 New Policy Proposal (Allocations from the last /8)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2010-02 New Policy Proposal (Allocations from the last /8)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Philip Smith
pfs at cisco.com
Fri Apr 16 01:49:29 CEST 2010
Hi James, James Blessing said the following on 13/04/10 23:54 : > On 13/04/2010 13:55, Ingrid Wijte wrote: >> PDP Number: 2010-02 > > Suggest Revised Text, just tweaking no real impact Actually, your suggestions are pretty major changes to the policy proposal. ;-) > Allocations from the last /8 > > The distribution of the last /8 held by the RIPE NCC will be done as > follows: > > 1. Unforeseen circumstances pool > > Once RIPE NCC recieves the final /8 from IANA, a /16 will be held in > reserve for some future uses, as yet unforeseen. In 2010-2, Alain and I proposed that once the RIPE NCC holds the *equivalent* of a /8 or less of IPv4 address space, the policy would apply. This is different from when RIPE NCC receives the final /8 from IANA, as there may well be still be some IPv4 address space remaining in other blocks. > 2. Allocations for LIRs from the last /8 > > On application for IPv4 resources when the RIPE NCC the final /8 has > been allocated by IANA to RIPE, LIRs will receive IPv4 addresses > according to the following: > > - LIRs may only receive one allocation from the final /8. The size of > the allocation made under this policy will be no larger than a /22. > Other space may be provided to the LIR should additional space outside > of the final /8 be available at the point of the request. We actually intended 2010-2 to apply to the remaining equivalent of a /8, not the last /8 that RIPE NCC receives from IANA. (For example, this could be two /11s from one /8 block, a /10 from another /8 block, and one /9 from a third /8 block.) There would be no other IPv4 space left at this stage. > 3. Final Exhaustion > > In the event that the unforeseen circumstances pool /16 remains unused > in the time the final /8 covered by this policy has been distributed, a > /15 will be returned to the main pool to be distributed as per clause 2. > > Once this /15 has been used then the final /15 will also be returned to > the pool s should an unforeseen usage have not been found. I think you mean /16 here, right? Thanks very much for your feedback! philip --
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2010-02 New Policy Proposal (Allocations from the last /8)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2010-02 New Policy Proposal (Allocations from the last /8)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]