This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Policy proposal 2009-01
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal 2009-01
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal 2009-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nigel Titley
nigel at titley.com
Wed Apr 14 11:53:41 CEST 2010
On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 10:27 +0100, Carlos Friacas wrote: > > 6. We adopt a slightly modified form of the proposal, which would allow > > RIPE to return address space to IANA with a proviso that this address space > > was returned on the basis that it may only be re-assigned to other RIRs who > > have adopted mandatory address space return. > > I tend to like this one... however, AFRINIC, LACNIC and APNIC would > probably need to ammend their already aproved policy on this subject > too... Yes, adoption of a modified form of the proposal just bangs another nail into the coffin. Can I reiterate? This proposal is dead. I'm just trying to make the funeral arrangements and give it a decent burial before people start to wrinkle their noses and remark how stuffy it's getting. Nigel
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal 2009-01
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal 2009-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]