[address-policy-wg] Policy proposal 2009-01

On Wed, 14 Apr 2010, Nick Hilliard wrote:

> On 13/04/2010 14:31, Nigel Titley wrote:
>> 1. We adopt it in its original form thus demonstrating solidarity with
>> the other regions, apart from Arin.
>>
>> 2. We adopt the Arin form of the proposal, thus demonstrating solidarity
>> with Arin, but with no one else
>>
>> 3. We reject the proposal outright, thus demonstrating that we can't
>> make up our minds or that we think it will never work, or something...
>>
>> 4. We ask the regional authors (in this case myself and Axel) to
>> withdraw the proposal in this region.
>
> There are two other options.
>
> 5. We adopt the proposal but make its commencement dependent on all other
> RIRs adopting it.
>
> or:
>
> 6. We adopt a slightly modified form of the proposal, which would allow
> RIPE to return address space to IANA with a proviso that this address space
> was returned on the basis that it may only be re-assigned to other RIRs who
> have adopted mandatory address space return.

I tend to like this one... however, AFRINIC, LACNIC and APNIC would 
probably need to ammend their already aproved policy on this subject 
too...

Regards,
Carlos


> Nick
>