This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Policy proposal 2009-01
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal 2009-01
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal 2009-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Wed Apr 14 00:40:34 CEST 2010
> As an old fogey with somewhat nostalgic views on how things work... > >> 1. We adopt it in its original form thus demonstrating solidarity with >> the other regions, apart from Arin. > > ...I suggest we do this. It took me a while to come around to this view > because I wasn't entirely sure that 'demonstrating solidarity' was the > right phrase to use, but on reflection it is spot on. > > Withdrawing or rejecting the policy puts us in the same position as ARIN > -- we can claim space from the mythical returned pool, but don't have to > return any for the common good ourselves, whereas AfriNIC, LACNIC and > APNIC, having passed their versions of the policy, do have to do that. <aol> arin's position would be embarrassing to them if they had a sense of social responsibility. randy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal 2009-01
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal 2009-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]