[address-policy-wg] 2009-02 New Policy Proposal (Allocating Resources to the RIPE NCC)

Hi Andy,

There won't be a contract because it's an impossibility - that's one of
the main rationales behind the proposal. We could have the NCC sign
twice but that's a bit ridiculous and won't be a legal contract anyway.

Best,

Remco

-----Original Message-----
From: address-policy-wg-admin at ripe.net
[mailto:address-policy-wg-admin at ripe.net] On Behalf Of Andy Davidson
Sent: dinsdag 24 maart 2009 18:23
To: address-policy-wg at ripe.net
Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2009-02 New Policy Proposal (Allocating
Resources to the RIPE NCC)


On 24 Mar 2009, at 15:41, Filiz Yilmaz wrote:

> A new RIPE Policy Proposal has been made and is now available for
> discussion.
>
> You can find the full proposal at:
>
>    http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2009-02.html

I like this better than the previous suggestion which created a new  
assignment type 'Assigned LIR'.

Since policies like 2007-01 require a contract to be held between the  
NCC and the requesting party, who are the parties of the contract for  
resources approved following the 2009-02 procedure?

Kind regards,
Andy Davidson.



This email is from Equinix Europe Limited or one of its associated/subsidiary companies. This email, and any files transmitted with it, contains information which is confidential, may be legally privileged and is solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this email immediately.  Equinix Europe Limited. Registered Office: Quadrant House, Floor 6, 17 Thomas More Street, Thomas More Square, London E1W 1YW. Registered in England and Wales No. 6293383.