This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2009-02 New Policy Proposal (Allocating Resources to the RIPE NCC)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-02 New Policy Proposal (Allocating Resources to the RIPE NCC)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-02 New Policy Proposal (Allocating Resources to the RIPE NCC)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andy Davidson
andy at nosignal.org
Tue Mar 24 18:22:44 CET 2009
On 24 Mar 2009, at 15:41, Filiz Yilmaz wrote: > A new RIPE Policy Proposal has been made and is now available for > discussion. > > You can find the full proposal at: > > http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2009-02.html I like this better than the previous suggestion which created a new assignment type 'Assigned LIR'. Since policies like 2007-01 require a contract to be held between the NCC and the requesting party, who are the parties of the contract for resources approved following the 2009-02 procedure? Kind regards, Andy Davidson.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-02 New Policy Proposal (Allocating Resources to the RIPE NCC)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-02 New Policy Proposal (Allocating Resources to the RIPE NCC)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]