This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2008-07 Discussion Period extended until 1 July 2009 (Ensuring efficient use of historical IPv4 resources)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-07 Discussion Period extended until 1 July 2009 (Ensuring efficient use of historical IPv4 resources)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-08 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 Provider Independent (PI) Assignments for LIRs)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Larisa A. Yurkina
ula at ripn.net
Wed Jun 3 13:28:01 CEST 2009
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Remco van Mook wrote: > > I support this proposal as it is. The obvious loophole would be that > historical space would be moved to a non-LIR entity but there's no way to > avoid that. > > Best, > > Remco Hi, I propse to change "... documentation of all address resources they hold..." to "... documentation for all Assignments they made..." because otherwise it is not clear what 'documentation' is. At the same time, what is 'Documentation for Assignments' is clear from the current policy document (see 6.1). Documentation is forms for their infrastructure and their cutomers requests, it says. Second. To understand what 'pre-RIR registrations' means, one should aware when 'RIR registrations' started. Which is difficult. I propose remove '(this includes pre-RIR registrations).' from the text because this may confuse people. The definition of 'Historical resources' is much better, but i'd changed '...before the existence of the RIPE NCC' to '...before the RIPE NCC was established in 1998' Some my LIR's allocations have been recieved in 1995-1998. RIPE NCC did not exist as legal entity it exists now, but still it was an organisation which have allocated those blocks. Does it mean that we have Historical resources? Thank you. > > > On 03-06-09 11:40, "Ingrid Wijte" <ingrid at ripe.net> wrote: > > > PDP Number: 2008-07 > > Ensuring efficient use of historical IPv4 resources > > > > Dear Colleagues, > > > > The text of the policy proposal 2008-07 has been revised based on the > > community feedback received on the mailing list. > > > > We have published the new version (version 2) today. As a result a new > > Discussion Phase is set for the proposal. > > > > You can find the full proposal at: > > > > http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2008-07.html > > > > We encourage you to review this policy proposal and send your comments > > to address-policy-wg at ripe.net before 1 July 2009. > > > > Regards, > > > > Ingrid Wijte > > Policy Development Officer > > RIPE NCC > > > > > > > > > > This email is from Equinix Europe Limited or one of its associated/subsidiary companies. This email, and any files transmitted with it, contains information which is confidential, may be legally privileged and is solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this email immediately. Equinix Europe Limited. Registered Office: Quadrant House, Floor 6, 17 Thomas More Street, Thomas More Square, London E1W 1YW. Registered in England and Wales No. 6293383. > > With respect, Larisa Yurkina --- RIPN Registry center -----
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-07 Discussion Period extended until 1 July 2009 (Ensuring efficient use of historical IPv4 resources)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-08 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 Provider Independent (PI) Assignments for LIRs)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]