This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2008-05 New Draft Documents Published (Anycasting Assignments for TLDs and Tier 0/1 ENUM)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-05 New Draft Documents Published (Anycasting Assignments for TLDs and Tier 0/1 ENUM)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-05 New Draft Documents Published (Anycasting Assignments for TLDs and Tier 0/1 ENUM)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Peter Koch
pk at DENIC.DE
Thu Apr 16 16:04:44 CEST 2009
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 09:00:36PM +0900, Randy Bush wrote: > i like "critical infrastructre." this is because, while i understand > that the roots need golden space, and i can almost see that anycasted > services need micro-allocations, i do not feel that tlds per se are > critical in the sense that they need golden space. that would suggest an external reference to the term and other evaluation criteria than those proposed. Also, could you elaborate on the difference between "micro-allocations" and "golden space"? > there is a reason the dns maps from names to addresses. use it. Sure, we use anycast to support performant and resilient mapping. -Peter
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-05 New Draft Documents Published (Anycasting Assignments for TLDs and Tier 0/1 ENUM)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-05 New Draft Documents Published (Anycasting Assignments for TLDs and Tier 0/1 ENUM)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]