[address-policy-wg] 2009-05 New Policy Proposal (Multiple IPv6 /32 Allocations for LIRs)

Leo, 

On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 09:02:06AM -0700, Leo Vegoda wrote:
> On 15/04/2009 2:34, "Marco Hogewoning" <marcoh at marcoh.net> wrote:
> > Let's assume you have a seperate entity in your company, which
> > operates in a different geographical region under it's own AS and
> > routing policy. Only one company (the holding for instance) is an LIR
> > in the  current situation.
> > 
> > How do you solve this at the moment iin IPv4-land ?
> 
> Good question. Isn't the normal answer to open a separate LIR for the
> separate business unit?


  Your solution, although possible, has some drawbacks:

  It adds  administrative burden, this was discussed here.
  But it also will diminish the remaining unallocated IPv4 space.

  I think we can modify your idea slightly. Let's assign 
  10 'scoring units' for a second and subsequent /32 not fulfilling HD-Ratio.
  It will effectively move an LIR to a higher billing category.
  This, plus requirement of seperate routing policy may convince people
  to support the new policy.

Jurek