[address-policy-wg] 2009-05 New Policy Proposal (Multiple IPv6 /32 Allocations for LIRs)

Piotr Strzyzewski pisze:
> Sometimes it is not that case. For example, there could be one entity
> (LIR) which serves with the same staff (one business unit; limited
> resources) both commercial and academic customers using different boxes,
> IPs and ASes and (sometimes the most important) funds, which (all) due
> to whatever reason(s) which is beyond the scope of this thread, could
> not be mixed together. Opening a separate LIR is either an abuse of
> current policy (*) or unnecessary waste of time and money.

We have similar situation as described above. And - as it was probably
said before in this discussion - many many LIRs in Poland, not only
academic ones.

I completely agree with your opinion, Piotr. Second LIR shouldn't be
created just for achieving same policy of routing as in today's IPv4
world. Business and political rules are staying the same for IPv6, we
are only changing type of addresses we use, thats all.

With only one prefix we can't get same setup as we have right now.

-- 
Tomasz Klicki            ICM Core Network Services, University of Warsaw
t.klicki at net.icm.edu.pl  (+48-22) 5520527, 8268009, fax. 8284195
                         http://www.net.icm.edu.pl/