This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2009-05 New Policy Proposal (Multiple IPv6 /32 Allocations for LIRs)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-05 New Policy Proposal (Multiple IPv6 /32 Allocations for LIRs)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [policy-announce] 2009-05 New Policy Proposal (Multiple IPv6 /32 Allocations for LIRs)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jakub Jermak
jakub.jermak at polsl.pl
Wed Apr 15 13:25:08 CEST 2009
Hello Remco, On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 05:36:09PM +0200, Remco van Mook wrote: > The 'unique routing policy' is already a requirement to get a second (or > any subsequent) AS as far as I know, so it doesn't really add any > limitation. Oh yes it does add limitation to a number of AS assigned by RIPE NCC to a given LIR. Recently I faced it. There has to be solid unique routing policy reason. Jakub Jermak -- - Jakub Jermak Silesian University of Technology - jermak at polsl.pl (JJ1214-RIPE) Akademicka 16, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland - PGP: http://hydra.ck.polsl.pl/~jermak phone: +48 32 230-76-86
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-05 New Policy Proposal (Multiple IPv6 /32 Allocations for LIRs)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [policy-announce] 2009-05 New Policy Proposal (Multiple IPv6 /32 Allocations for LIRs)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]