[address-policy-wg] 2009-05 New Policy Proposal (Multiple IPv6 /32 Allocations for LIRs)

Hi Daniel,

The 'unique routing policy' is already a requirement to get a second (or
any subsequent) AS as far as I know, so it doesn't really add any
limitation.

Best,

Remco

-----Original Message-----
From: address-policy-wg-admin at ripe.net
[mailto:address-policy-wg-admin at ripe.net] On Behalf Of Rueegg, Daniel
Sent: dinsdag 14 april 2009 17:23
To: address-policy-wg at ripe.net
Subject: RE: [address-policy-wg] 2009-05 New Policy Proposal (Multiple
IPv6 /32 Allocations for LIRs)

Hi Remco,
I'm not sure where you see that a second AS would allow a LIR to get a
second /32. I'm happy to reword the Policy Text but I think it already
specifies the rule: "...separate AS number and a unique routing
policy..."
The unique routing policy implies that the two AS will have different
peering relations so are operated as two different networks. I'm happy
to add a sentence about peering too it that makes it clear.

I agree to the comment Marco wrote. It would make sense to specify a
time-line by when a low used /32 has to be returned after AS have merged
together.

Dani



-----Original Message-----
From: address-policy-wg-admin at ripe.net
[mailto:address-policy-wg-admin at ripe.net] On Behalf Of Remco van Mook
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 5:01 PM
To: address-policy-wg at ripe.net
Subject: RE: [address-policy-wg] 2009-05 New Policy Proposal (Multiple
IPv6 /32 Allocations for LIRs)


Dear all,

While I sympathise with the idea, I don't support the proposal as-is
today. As I read it, it allows a LIR to avoid any requirements for
fillrates of address space as long as they've got an extra AS,
essentially making the number of ASes a metric for the amount of address
space one can get without questions. This puts a lot of extra weight on
the decision of assigning an extra AS to a LIR and that should be a
fully separate discussion.

If we can somehow fix this unintended interdependency I'll gladly review
my opinion.


Kind regards,

Remco van Mook

-----Original Message-----
From: address-policy-wg-admin at ripe.net
[mailto:address-policy-wg-admin at ripe.net] On Behalf Of Ingrid Wijte
Sent: dinsdag 14 april 2009 14:58
To: policy-announce at ripe.net
Cc: address-policy-wg at ripe.net
Subject: [address-policy-wg] 2009-05 New Policy Proposal (Multiple IPv6
/32 Allocations for LIRs)

PDP Number: 2009-05
Multiple IPv6 /32 Allocations for LIRs

Dear Colleagues

A new RIPE Policy Proposal has been made and is now available for
discussion.

You can find the full proposal at:

    http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2009-05.html

We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to
<address-policy-wg at ripe.net> before 12 May 2009.

Regards

Ingrid Wijte
Assistant Policy Development Officer
RIPE NCC



This email is from Equinix Europe Limited or one of its
associated/subsidiary companies. This email, and any files transmitted
with it, contains information which is confidential, may be legally
privileged and is solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you
have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete
this email immediately.  Equinix Europe Limited. Registered Office:
Quadrant House, Floor 6, 17 Thomas More Street, Thomas More Square,
London E1W 1YW. Registered in England and Wales No. 6293383.