This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2009-05 New Policy Proposal (Multiple IPv6 /32 Allocations for LIRs)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-05 New Policy Proposal (Multiple IPv6 /32 Allocations for LIRs)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: Multiple IPv6 /32 Allocations for LIRs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jerzy Pawlus
Jerzy.Pawlus at cyf-kr.edu.pl
Wed Apr 15 12:22:12 CEST 2009
Sascha Lenz writes:
> I have a similar problem where i have to descide upon continuing to
> announce /40s ("Sub-Allocations") of a /32 PA Allocation for seperate
> ASNs with "fallback tunnels" to the AS announcing the /32 (so i don't
> loose traffic from providers doing strict-RIR-filtering) - or to get ~50
> PI assignments (for now, more in the future) and announce each of those
> seperately since i can't aggregate that.
We all have similar problems and think how much time we wasted on finding
solution.
Jurek
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-05 New Policy Proposal (Multiple IPv6 /32 Allocations for LIRs)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: Multiple IPv6 /32 Allocations for LIRs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]