[address-policy-wg] 2009-05 New Policy Proposal (Multiple IPv6 /32 Allocations for LIRs)

People can also filter all ASNs ending with the digit 4. There¹s no policy
against it. Doesn¹t make it less stupid, though.

Remco


On 15-04-09 11:37, "Jerzy Pawlus" <Jerzy.Pawlus at cyf-kr.edu.pl> wrote:

> 
> 
> * Florian Weimer
> 
>> >
>> > In any case, to me it looks like multiple requests for /32s are needed
>> > only to work around route filters.  If this is really the case, those
>> > filters have to go.
>> >
>   But you can't build your long term business plan on that assumpion
>   There will be be some who would filter it.
> 
> Jurek
> 
> 



This email is from Equinix Europe Limited or one of its associated/subsidiary companies. This email, and any files transmitted with it, contains information which is confidential, may be legally privileged and is solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this email immediately.  Equinix Europe Limited. Registered Office: Quadrant House, Floor 6, 17 Thomas More Street, Thomas More Square, London E1W 1YW. Registered in England and Wales No. 6293383.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20090415/f28993eb/attachment.html>