<HTML> <HEAD> <TITLE>Re: [address-policy-wg] 2009-05 New Policy Proposal (Multiple IPv6 /32 Allocations for LIRs)</TITLE> </HEAD> <BODY> People can also filter all ASNs ending with the digit 4. There’s no policy against it. Doesn’t make it less stupid, though. Remco On 15-04-09 11:37, "Jerzy Pawlus" <<a href="Jerzy.Pawlus@cyf-kr.edu.pl">Jerzy.Pawlus@cyf-kr.edu.pl</a>> wrote: <BLOCKQUOTE> * Florian Weimer > > In any case, to me it looks like multiple requests for /32s are needed > only to work around route filters. If this is really the case, those > filters have to go. > But you can't build your long term business plan on that assumpion There will be be some who would filter it. Jurek </BLOCKQUOTE> This email is from Equinix Europe Limited or one of its associated/subsidiary companies. This email, and any files transmitted with it, contains information which is confidential, may be legally privileged and is solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this email immediately. Equinix Europe Limited. Registered Office: Quadrant House, Floor 6, <?xml:namespace prefix = st1 ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" /><st1:Street w:st="on"><st1:address w:st="on">17 Thomas More Street</st1:address></st1:Street>, <st1:address w:st="on"><st1:Street w:st="on">Thomas More Square</st1:Street>, <st1:City w:st="on">London</st1:City> <st1:PostalCode w:st="on">E1W 1YW</st1:PostalCode></st1:address>. Registered in <st1:country-region w:st="on">England</st1:country-region> and <st1:country-region w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Wales</st1:place></st1:country-region> No. 6293383.<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p></o:p> </body> </HTML>