This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2009-05 New Policy Proposal (Multiple IPv6 /32 Allocations for LIRs)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-05 New Policy Proposal (Multiple IPv6 /32 Allocations for LIRs)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-05 New Policy Proposal (Multiple IPv6 /32 Allocations for LIRs)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marco Hogewoning
marcoh at marcoh.net
Wed Apr 15 11:41:15 CEST 2009
On 15 apr 2009, at 11:25, Jerzy Pawlus wrote: > New version: > > --------------------- > 5.2.1. Subsequent allocation criteria > > a) Subsequent allocation will be provided when an organisation (i.e. > ISP/LIR) > satisfies the evaluation threshold of past address utilisation in > terms of > the number of sites in units of /56 assignments. The HD-Ratio [RFC > 3194] > is used to determine the utilisation thresholds that justify > the allocation of additional address as described below. > > b) An LIR may request an additional minimum allocation size for a > second and > subsequent Autonomus System assigned to that LIR. > > -------------------------- And there are basically no limitittations on getting a seperate AS number to work around a), so you might as well drop 5.2.1 completely. Groet, MarcoH
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-05 New Policy Proposal (Multiple IPv6 /32 Allocations for LIRs)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-05 New Policy Proposal (Multiple IPv6 /32 Allocations for LIRs)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]