[address-policy-wg] 2009-05 New Policy Proposal (Multiple IPv6 /32 Allocations for LIRs)

On 14 apr 2009, at 14:57, Ingrid Wijte wrote:

> A new RIPE Policy Proposal has been made and is now available for
> discussion.
> 
> You can find the full proposal at:
> 
>     http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2009-05.html
> 


  There is a need of changing ripe-450. There are some LIR's
  which have more than one routing policy. This was possible with IPv4
  and is impossible with IPv6. 
  We are all worried about a slow deployment of IPv6 but we ourselves
  are slowing it down. Look, where IPv4 started. In IPv6 we want to
  be perfect from the beginning. It is O.K but there is a "real life" too.

  I will support this proposal if the reference to "different unconnected 
  geographical areas" is removed. It is a bit unclear, and what area we have
  in mind?

  My original thought of new version of ripe-450 was:


New version:

---------------------
5.2.1. Subsequent allocation criteria

a) Subsequent allocation will be provided when an organisation (i.e. ISP/LIR)
   satisfies the evaluation threshold of past address utilisation in terms of
   the number of sites in units of /56 assignments. The HD-Ratio [RFC 3194]
   is used to determine the utilisation thresholds that justify
   the allocation of additional address as described below.

b) An LIR may request an additional minimum allocation size for a second and
   subsequent Autonomus System assigned to that LIR.

--------------------------


Regards,


Jurek


P.S. Allow our children to fix something.