This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2008-06 New Policy Proposal (Use of final /8)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-06 New Policy Proposal (Use of final /8)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-06 New Policy Proposal (Use of final /8)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marco Hogewoning
marcoh at marcoh.net
Tue Oct 28 09:03:02 CET 2008
On Oct 28, 2008, at 11:55 AM, Max Tulyev wrote: > García Fernández wrote: >> 1. New LIRs: Get the minimum allocation IF they already have a IPv6 >> allocation OR the ask for an IPv6 allocation in the same request. > > There is no difficult to get an IPv6 network. Just to send a request, > regarding they want to use it or not. So this point is useless or even > harm as wastes IPv6 resources. It seems to me this is just there 'for completeness', by the time this policy applies it seems that building an IPv4 only network won't get you that far as the rest of the world has run out, won't get any new ones and finally will be working on v6 rollout. Marco
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-06 New Policy Proposal (Use of final /8)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-06 New Policy Proposal (Use of final /8)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]