This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2008-06 New Policy Proposal (Use of final /8)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-06 New Policy Proposal (Use of final /8)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-06 New Policy Proposal (Use of final /8)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Max Tulyev
president at ukraine.su
Tue Oct 28 08:55:46 CET 2008
García Fernández wrote: > 1. New LIRs: Get the minimum allocation IF they already have a IPv6 > allocation OR the ask for an IPv6 allocation in the same request. There is no difficult to get an IPv6 network. Just to send a request, regarding they want to use it or not. So this point is useless or even harm as wastes IPv6 resources. > 2. Existing LIR: Sorry boys, you had a lot of time to prepare for this. Agree. > 3. OK. Agree with a secuirity pool. Agree. This can be named "The Golden IPv4 Pool" as for price it will be finally sold^Wallocated ;))) -- WBR, Max Tulyev (MT6561-RIPE, 2:463/253 at FIDO)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-06 New Policy Proposal (Use of final /8)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-06 New Policy Proposal (Use of final /8)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]