This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Revised 2006-01 set back to Discussion Phase (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revised 2006-01 set back to Discussion Phase (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revised 2006-01 set back to Discussion Phase (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
sergey miassoedov
sergey at devnull.ru
Wed Nov 26 08:13:58 CET 2008
Hello, Wednesday, November 26, 2008, 8:08:31 AM, you wrote: >> c) meet the requirements of the policies described in the RIPE NCC document >> entitled ³Contractual Requirements for Provider Independent Resources Holders >> in the RIPE NCC Service Region² LV> Is this document available for review yet? It seems to form an integral part LV> of the proposed policy. This is a part of accepted policy. http://ripe.net/ripe/draft-documents/ripe-new-draft2007-01-v4.html -- Kind regards, sergey myasoedov
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revised 2006-01 set back to Discussion Phase (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revised 2006-01 set back to Discussion Phase (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]