This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Revised 2006-01 set back to Discussion Phase (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revised 2006-01 set back to Discussion Phase (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revised 2006-01 set back to Discussion Phase (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Leo Vegoda
leo.vegoda at icann.org
Wed Nov 26 08:08:31 CET 2008
Hi, > To qualify for an IPv6 PI address space, an organisation must: > a) not be an IPv6 LIR; Does this mean that the IPv6 PI assignment must be reclaimed by the RIPE NCC if a company that runs an LIR and has an IPv6 allocation buys a company that uses an IPv6 PI assignment? [...] > c) meet the requirements of the policies described in the RIPE NCC document > entitled ³Contractual Requirements for Provider Independent Resources Holders > in the RIPE NCC Service Region² Is this document available for review yet? It seems to form an integral part of the proposed policy. [...] > The minimum size of the assignment is a /48. Organisations requesting a larger > assignment (shorter prefix) must provide documentation justifying the need for > additional subnets. > > Additional assignments may also be made when there is a technical need > demanding this or usage justified. When possible, these further assignments > will be made from an adjacent address block. The phrase "a technical need demanding this or usage justified" is a bit vague. It would be nice to have some kind of guide so that applicants and the RIPE NCC have an idea of what the bar is (meant to be). > Assignments will be allocated from a separate 'designated block' to facilitate I'd suggest changing the word "allocated" to "taken". Regards, Leo Vegoda
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revised 2006-01 set back to Discussion Phase (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revised 2006-01 set back to Discussion Phase (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]