This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Assignments for Critical Infrastruction
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Assignments for Critical Infrastruction
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Assignments for Critical Infrastruction
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Tue Nov 18 23:06:54 CET 2008
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 04:55:22PM +0200, Greg L. wrote:
> Current IPv4 already provides more advantage to ccTLD and gTLD with IPv4
> /24 prefix allocations for BGP anycast than for other business entities
> that would like to get /24 prefix for BGP anycast DNS deployments.
Well. I have not yet seen a specific proposal coming from a company
that explains what they are doing with anycast and that is *not* running
a *TLD (or ENUM).
So who are you, what are you doing, and what would be your proposal how
to amend the policies?
(If you're happy with Arin space, be my guest - less work for us)
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 128645
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Assignments for Critical Infrastruction
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Assignments for Critical Infrastruction
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]