This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Revised 2007-01 moved back to Review Period (Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revised 2007-01 moved back to Review Period (Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revised 2007-01 moved back to ReviewPeriod (Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Per Heldal
heldal at eml.cc
Sun Jul 13 10:02:02 CEST 2008
On Fri, 2008-07-11 at 16:43 -0700, Jeffrey A. Williams wrote: > Florian and all, > > I for one agree with your conclusion. I do have a question. > Whom is doing the policing of RIPE's PI space/routing? > Is that ICANN/IANA or is such policing done at all? Or > are the LIR's supposed to do such policing themselves without > oversight? Policing is not so important in a regime where the reward for good behaviour is better than what can be achieved by breaking the rules. The community isn't big on penalties. That's why we're struggling so hard to avoid a situation that forces us to use a stick once we're out of carrots. //per
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revised 2007-01 moved back to Review Period (Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revised 2007-01 moved back to ReviewPeriod (Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]