[address-policy-wg] 2008-01 New Policy Proposal (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)

On 16 Jan 2008, at 18:56, Florian Weimer wrote:

> * michael dillon:
>
>> - No PI assignments via LIRs. LIRs only manage PA IPv6.
>> - special membership in RIPE with an annual fee for PI holders
>
> How do you handle lack of payment?  Reuse the prefix?  That seems  
> like a
> bad idea to me.

If this is a bad idea...

> I would also see a mandate to keep current address information,
> including legal details (register of companies number etc.) in the  
> WHOIS
> database.  RIPE NCC will investigate cases if proof is presented that
> something is wrong in the database (bouncing email, non-working phone
> number, bouncing snail mail, lack of matching entry in the register of
> companies).

... then what is the enforcement mechanism here?

You've just defined a system where the RIPE NCC will guarantee the  
uniqueness of address space for a one-time fee *and* allow registrants  
to remain anonymous after the first 12 months. I can see a definite  
market for something like this.

Regards,

Leo