[address-policy-wg] 2008-01 New Policy Proposal (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)

* michael dillon:

> - No PI assignments via LIRs. LIRs only manage PA IPv6.
> - special membership in RIPE with an annual fee for PI holders

How do you handle lack of payment?  Reuse the prefix?  That seems like a
bad idea to me.

I would also see a mandate to keep current address information,
including legal details (register of companies number etc.) in the WHOIS
database.  RIPE NCC will investigate cases if proof is presented that
something is wrong in the database (bouncing email, non-working phone
number, bouncing snail mail, lack of matching entry in the register of
companies).

> - contact every IPv4 PI holder by email and inform them of the 
>   new rules for IPv6 PI allocations

Email addresses are currently optional, AFAICT.  It's probably spamming,
too.