This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Revisiting RIPE Policy Proposal 2007-01
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revisiting RIPE Policy Proposal 2007-01
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revisiting RIPE Policy Proposal 2007-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hank Nussbacher
hank at efes.iucc.ac.il
Thu Dec 4 17:37:04 CET 2008
At 04:51 PM 04-12-08 +0100, Gert Doering wrote: >Hank complained that he did not receive the announcement mail. This does >not necessarily mean that "the people in the RIPE NCC made some mistakes". > > > Mistakes happen, but in order to fix them we need to understand > > exactly what it was that did happen and why it happened that way. > >I agree with this part... > > > The notices to the RIPE announcement list are irrelevant in this > > case. > >To the contrary. Mail gets lost due to SPAM filtering or other reasons >all day. Having Message-IDs enables people to figure out whether their >mailserver has indeed seen the e-mail (and delivered it somewhere or >dropped it), or not. Can someone from RIPE NCC make a test posting to the ncc-announcements list to see if I get it? Thanks, Hank
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revisiting RIPE Policy Proposal 2007-01
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revisiting RIPE Policy Proposal 2007-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]