This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Revisiting RIPE Policy Proposal 2007-01
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revisiting RIPE Policy Proposal 2007-01
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revisiting RIPE Policy Proposal 2007-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
michael.dillon at bt.com
michael.dillon at bt.com
Thu Dec 4 16:59:51 CET 2008
> Your assumption seems to be "the RIPE NCC is responsible for > all evil in the world". You might want to reconsider this position. No that is NOT my assumption. But I do see a certain arrogance on the part of RIPE WG chairs, and RIPE NCC staff. We're all human and make mistakes once in a while, but when you take responsibility for doing a particular job that serves other people, you have to be seen to be helpful. In any case, I did make some wrong assumptions from your first email because you did not explain that it could be a SPAM filter issue, and that looking for the announcement email would be a good check to see if filtering was taking place. Your idea was a good one although I would hope that the RIPE NCC staff do check to see whether they sent out the LIR emails that Hank claims he did not receieve. --Michael Dillon
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revisiting RIPE Policy Proposal 2007-01
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revisiting RIPE Policy Proposal 2007-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]