[address-policy-wg] IPv6 assignment for the RIPE meetingnetwork

On Thu, 4 Dec 2008, Andy Davidson wrote:

>
> On 3 Dec 2008, at 10:48, Andrei Robachevsky wrote:
>
>> But meeting the "Contractual requirements" is more difficult, since in a 
>> way that will require the RIPE NCC to have a contract with ourselves and to 
>> evaluate our own request. Perhaps a more elegant solution here would be the 
>> one proposed by Remco back in November (to establish a policy that lets the 
>> NCC file a request in the ordinary way).
>
> Does "The RIPE Community" exist as a legal entity ?  Can the community hold 
> the meeting resources and agree to hold a contract with the NCC ?

     No, and No.
     That is one of the reasons that back in 1992 the 'RIPE Community'
     decided to create the RIPE NCC.

>
> Andy

     Rob