This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] IPv6 assignment for the RIPE meetingnetwork
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 assignment for the RIPE meetingnetwork
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 assignment for the RIPE meetingnetwork
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andy Davidson
andy at nosignal.org
Thu Dec 4 11:38:33 CET 2008
On 3 Dec 2008, at 10:48, Andrei Robachevsky wrote: > But meeting the "Contractual requirements" is more difficult, since > in a way that will require the RIPE NCC to have a contract with > ourselves and to evaluate our own request. Perhaps a more elegant > solution here would be the one proposed by Remco back in November > (to establish a policy that lets the NCC file a request in the > ordinary way). Does "The RIPE Community" exist as a legal entity ? Can the community hold the meeting resources and agree to hold a contract with the NCC ? Andy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 assignment for the RIPE meetingnetwork
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 assignment for the RIPE meetingnetwork
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]