This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] new policy idea for PA allocations
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] new policy idea for PA allocations
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] new policy idea for PA allocations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Thu Aug 7 22:34:19 CEST 2008
Remco van Mook wrote: > I have read it and I understand that it's only about the last /8. I > apologise for not making a more elaborate and eloquent reference. But > considering the scenario, wouldn't you agree that I'm also talking about > the same timeframe? [ just trying to be precise here ] the apnic region has no policy or policy proposals other than the current you-get-what-you-justify for space other than the last /8 from the free pool. > AFAIK we don't have any significant number of requests for PA larger > than a /8 (fortunately) in this case, i suspect a 'significant number' would be about one. listen to alain durand (comcast) and miyakawa shin (ntt) some time and be very fearful. they are in a terrible trade-off space. they either get a lot of public /8s or break the ipv4 internet [0] for their customers. currently they are opting for the latter. > And it is a 'one size fits all' approach :-) actually, not exactly. the spnic proposal very purposfuly says the then current smallest allocation size. as things get tight, one might expect that size to change. randy --- [0] with 'carrier class nat' in the net core, you will get to write to comcast's walled garden lawyers when you want to deploy a new application that needs help from the nat.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] new policy idea for PA allocations
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] new policy idea for PA allocations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]