[address-policy-wg] new policy idea for PA allocations

I have read it and I understand that it's only about the last /8. I
apologise for not making a more elaborate and eloquent reference. But
considering the scenario, wouldn't you agree that I'm also talking about
the same timeframe? AFAIK we don't have any significant number of
requests for PA larger than a /8 (fortunately)

And it is a 'one size fits all' approach :-)

Remco

-----Original Message-----
From: Randy Bush [mailto:randy at psg.com] 
Sent: donderdag 7 augustus 2008 18:56
To: Remco van Mook
Cc: David Conrad; matthew.ford at bt.com; shane at time-travellers.org;
address-policy-wg at ripe.net
Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] new policy idea for PA allocations

> Alternatively we could take the 'one size fits all' approach as has
been
> proposed in the APNIC region as referred to by Randy.

you may want to actually read the apnic proposal to which you are
referring.  it is only for the last /8

randy


Any opinions expressed in the email are those of the individual and not necessarily of the company. This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and solely for the use of the intended recipient and do not constitute an offer or acceptance by Equinix, Inc., Equinix Europe Ltd or any of their group entities to buy or sell any products or services in any jurisdiction. If you have received this email in error please delete this email immediately and notify the IT manager.

This communication is sent on behalf of one of the European entities in the Equinix, Inc. Group. The ultimate holding company in Europe is Equinix Europe Ltd whose registered address is Quadrant House, Floor 6, 17 Thomas More Street, Thomas More Square, London E1W 1YW and the Company's registered number is 6293383. The registration details of other Group entities are available at www.eu.equinix.com