This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com
bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com
Mon Sep 25 21:31:14 CEST 2006
On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 08:40:18AM -1000, Randy Bush wrote: > > wow... address ownership. thats kind of a new concept. > > last i checked, most RIRs deal with the concept of address > > stewardship. does that mean i can assert ownership of > > integers and the RIR system will back me up? > > thanks for very educational contribution. > > randy your welcome. and unless you have verifiable information to the contrary, i (for one) would appreciate it if you would be more precise regarding address allocation/delegation and stewardship. To my understanding, addresses are NOT property and can not be owned. I will be pleased to be reliably informed otherwise. Please educate me here. --bill
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]