This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Mon Sep 25 21:37:51 CEST 2006
> your welcome. and unless you have verifiable information > to the contrary, i (for one) would appreciate it if > you would be more precise regarding address allocation/delegation > and stewardship. To my understanding, addresses are NOT > property and can not be owned. > I will be pleased to be reliably informed otherwise. Please > educate me here. sorry, bill. i stick to engineering and leave layers 9-42 to experts such as yourself. but good red herring (sorry for idiom. red herrings are a bad smell dragged across a trail to keep others from being able to follow it). randy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]