This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Mon Sep 18 21:55:56 CEST 2006
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 06:52:37PM +0200, Oliver Bartels wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 18:33:54 +0200, Jeroen Massar wrote:
> > (who indeed would like to see a scheme like sBGP deployed :)
>
> The sBGP will consume _significantly_ more resources in the
> network for even a small amount of sBGP prefixes than PI will
> consume ever.
There is no need to run the sBGP crypto on all routers on all prefixes in
realtime. Especially not on "session startup" time - assuming that
a significant set of your neighbour routers have been doing sBGP
verification on a largish subset of the routes in their tables, doing
the verification as a low-prio thing (and dropping BGP prefixes that
fail verification) should suffice.
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 94488
SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster at Space.Net
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0
D- 80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-234
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]