This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Oliver Bartels
oliver at bartels.de
Mon Sep 18 18:52:37 CEST 2006
Hi Jeroen, On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 18:33:54 +0200, Jeroen Massar wrote: > (who indeed would like to see a scheme like sBGP deployed :) The sBGP will consume _significantly_ more resources in the network for even a small amount of sBGP prefixes than PI will consume ever. Crypto Algos require a lot of computational power on conventional CPU's, the very huge majority of backbone routers has no special crypto hardware on board. _If_ sBGB should be implemented, I do sugest to make the BGP PI-friendly (e.g. separation of prefix and AS attributes) in the same step, as sBGB will require an router hardware and software update anyway. Best Regards Oliver Bartels Oliver Bartels F+E + Bartels System GmbH + 85435 Erding, Germany oliver at bartels.de + http://www.bartels.de + Tel. +49-8122-9729-0
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]