This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2006-07 New Policy Proposal (Minimum IPv4 Assignment Window)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-07 New Policy Proposal (Minimum IPv4 Assignment Window)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-07 New Policy Proposal (Minimum IPv4 Assignment Window)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Wed Oct 4 10:29:40 CEST 2006
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 10:25:50AM +0200, Fernando García wrote:
> I would modify your propossal to:
> 1st AW or /24
> Raised AW to /22 after the first or second allocation is made if
> there are no errors in those.
Well, that's the way it is now - if you send a few requests to the
NCC hostmasters, and they are approved, you're granted an AW of the
size of these requests (roughly so).
So we wouldn't actually need the second sentence, it would account
to "minimum AW of a /24"... - which I could live with, but Leo is
clearly aiming for "more".
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 98999
SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster at Space.Net
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0
D- 80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-234
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-07 New Policy Proposal (Minimum IPv4 Assignment Window)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-07 New Policy Proposal (Minimum IPv4 Assignment Window)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]