This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2006-07 New Policy Proposal (Minimum IPv4 Assignment Window)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-07 New Policy Proposal (Minimum IPv4 Assignment Window)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-07 New Policy Proposal (Minimum IPv4 Assignment Window)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Fernando García
fgarcia at eurocomercial.es
Wed Oct 4 10:25:50 CEST 2006
hello El 04/10/2006, a las 10:19, Gert Doering escribió: > I'd propose a minimum AW of /24, to be raised to a /22 if the LIR has > sent one? two? person(s) to a LIR training course (and the trainer is > convinced that these people have listened and understood the rules). Considering that the training course doesn't have an examn, it's dificult for the trainer to know how much people has understood. I would modify your propossal to: 1st AW or /24 Raised AW to /22 after the first or second allocation is made if there are no errors in those. Regards, Fernando ------------------------------------------------ Fernando Garcia |Tel: +34 91 4359687 EUROCOMERCIAL I&C SA |Fax: +34 91 4313240 Valentín Beato, 5 |e-mail: fgarcia at eurocomercial.es E-28037 Madrid | Spain |http://www.eurocomercial.es
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-07 New Policy Proposal (Minimum IPv4 Assignment Window)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-07 New Policy Proposal (Minimum IPv4 Assignment Window)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]