This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #alpha: TLD Anycast Allocation Policy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #alpha: TLD Anycast Allocation Policy
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #alpha: TLD Anycast Allocation Policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Thu Mar 24 20:08:23 CET 2005
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 03:44:42PM +0000, Jon Lawrence wrote:
> > This is why people propose reserving a range for PI assignments, so
> > that this range can have different filtering. No rocket science.
> But Daniel, there's no such thing as v6 PI :)
> As I read it, they're talking about reserving a block for what would
> effectively be micro-allocations no PI.
Microallocations are PI in disguise - end users get address space directly
from a RIR. If that's not PI, then what else is?
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 71007 (66629)
SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster at Space.Net
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0
D- 80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-234
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #alpha: TLD Anycast Allocation Policy
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #alpha: TLD Anycast Allocation Policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]