[address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #alpha: TLD Anycast Allocation Policy

On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 03:44:42PM +0000, Jon Lawrence wrote:
> On Thursday 24 March 2005 14:44, Daniel Roesen wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 02:55:24PM +0100, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> > > So how exactly do I build a prefix length filter that only applies to
> > > allocations and not assignments?
> >
> > This is why people propose reserving a range for PI assignments, so
> > that this range can have different filtering. No rocket science.
> >
> But Daniel, there's no such thing as v6 PI :)

That's what THEY want to make you believe. :-)=

> As I read it, they're talking about reserving a block for what would 
> effectively be micro-allocations no PI.

And what's the difference please? Especially since those aren't
allocations (you can't assign more-specifics to others) but assignments?

Don't play with words. It's IPv6 PI for whoever-is-deemed-special.


Regards,
Daniel

-- 
CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr at cluenet.de -- dr at IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0