This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #alpha: TLD Anycast Allocation Policy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #alpha: TLD Anycast Allocation Policy
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #alpha: TLD Anycast Allocation Policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Joao Damas
joao-ripe at c-l-i.net
Thu Mar 24 15:14:55 CET 2005
On 24 Mar, 2005, at 15:10, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote: > On 24-mrt-05, at 15:06, Joao Damas wrote: > >> Regarding the issue of flap damp(en)ing parameters, I think we should >> really revisit the flap damp(en)ing recommendations again at RIPE 50. > > It should happen before doing anything with regard to this proposal, > though. And what kind of changes do you imagine? OH, that would be for the wg to discuss, but perhaps deprecation would be amongst the possibilities that need consideration > >> PS: regarding entries in the routing table and the pollution it >> causes, keep an eye on RFCs coming soon. > > Do you have the draft names? That saves me the waiting. :-) > In this case it would not, really :) You will have to be a bit patient. Joao
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #alpha: TLD Anycast Allocation Policy
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #alpha: TLD Anycast Allocation Policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]