[address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #alpha: TLD Anycast Allocation Policy

On 24-mrt-05, at 15:06, Joao Damas wrote:

> Regarding the issue of flap damp(en)ing parameters, I think we should 
> really revisit the flap damp(en)ing recommendations again at RIPE 50.

It should happen before doing anything with regard to this proposal, 
though. And what kind of changes do you imagine?

> PS: regarding entries in the routing table and the pollution it 
> causes, keep an eye on RFCs coming soon.

Do you have the draft names? That saves me the waiting.  :-)

> PS: regarding the use of "wrong DNS software", the TLD operator is 
> running *SERVERS* and providing services to resolvers/users. The best 
> they can do is provide as good a service as they can to their 
> consumers, not preach to them about them running the wrong client side 
> software.

We shouldn't go out of our way to help people who don't help 
themselves. Inflating the routing table because DNS software doesn't do 
what it should do is WRONG.