[address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #alpha: TLD Anycast Allocation Policy

On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 10:58:18AM +0100, Elmar K. Bins wrote:
> I myself would prefer a defined range (say, a /32 block out of which
> /48s are allocated), but I seem to be a minority with that opinion.
> This range would allow operators to exclude it from their filters.

I totally agree. Derriving policy from prefix length (at least in the
range up to /48) is just bogus and shouldn't be supported by issuing
/32s to guarrantee routability. The folks filtering ANYTHING longer
than /32 or /35 are just wrong. A /48 is far more than enough.

> > I don't see why RIPE need to assign a /32 when the other regions are 
> > /48s? I would also like to add that these assignments should be made 
> > out of a single block.
> 
> Joining the minority? ;-)

I certainly do.


Best regards,
Daniel

-- 
CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr at cluenet.de -- dr at IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0