[address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #alpha: TLD Anycast Allocation Policy

On 23 Mar, 2005, at 10:36, Kurt Erik Lindqvist wrote:
> I don't see why RIPE need to assign a /32 when the other regions are
> /48s? I would also like to add that these assignments should be made
> out of a single block.

What would the problem be with the /32, really? Counting the addresses?

Howeverm, the "out of a single block" is the part that really bothers 
me. Putting supposedly "critical infrastructure" as it is called 
elsewhere in a block that makes them all share fate in the event of 
network "optimisations" is still a bad idea.

>
> Also, to follow the "have you considered private address space" (or
> whatever the exact formulation is ) question in the PI application, I
> would like to require the applicant to consider using an existing
> anycasting service.

Sounds like a good idea, actually.

Joao