[address-policy-wg] IPv6 access to K-root

On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 07:00:27PM +0100, Jeroen Massar wrote:

> Also for the folks complaining about rootservers getting a /32 and those
> not being available to ccTLD servers, why don't you move to the APNIC
> region, there even the .jp root has a /32....

And now the next question: If a ccTLD NS gets a /32, why shouldn't a
Authoratitative NS for a real big number of Domains (of a domain hoster, for
example) get a /32? What is the difference between a ccTLD Nameserver and
any other authoritative NS?

I think the problem is not, that ccTLD Nameservers do not get a assignment,
the problem is much more general: Addresses are assigned in the way that
suits ISPs quite nicely but for sites is a major pain in the rear end. As
long as this does not change IPv6 will stay what it is today: A nice
platform for testing and playing without any business relevance.

Nils

-- 
Der Minister nimmt flüsternd den Bischof beim Arm:
"Halt Du sie dumm - ich halt sie Arm"
                      [Reinhard Mey, 'Sei Wachsam']