This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] IPv6 access to K-root
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 access to K-root
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 access to K-root
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jeroen Massar
jeroen at unfix.org
Fri Feb 25 19:00:27 CET 2005
On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 17:53 +0100, Kurt Erik Lindqvist wrote: >On Feb 25, 2005, at 1:23 AM, Jon Lawrence wrote: >> >> Be interesting to see what they come back with. >> How can multihoming be suitable to one kind of service and not another >> - I'll >> wait 'til they publish they're docs, you can explain then Iljitsch :) >> (unless >> we're talking locators again). > >Documents are published. Protocol work will be done in new WG. >Architecture published. Multi6 is closing in two weeks. Yes, there will >be identifiers and locators. Shibby... eehmm Shim6 that is ;) Also for the folks complaining about rootservers getting a /32 and those not being available to ccTLD servers, why don't you move to the APNIC region, there even the .jp root has a /32.... Greets, Jeroen -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 240 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20050225/2de33ae9/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 access to K-root
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 access to K-root
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]