This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: 200 customer requirements for IPv6
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: 200 customer requirements for IPv6
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: 200 customer requirements for IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Michael.Dillon at btradianz.com
Michael.Dillon at btradianz.com
Wed Dec 7 11:42:21 CET 2005
> The internet only works as long as 99% of all people carry 99% of all > routes. When a sizeable number of people starts filtering a sizeable > number of routes for whatever reason, either technical (won't fit in > their routers) or political (don't agree with the policies) then > we're in knee-deep brown stuff. And this is something that RIPE and ARIN cannot directly change. RIR policy can only encourage or discourage ISPs from carrying 99% of all routes. I think that the current policy for IPv6 is one which discourages people from using IPv6. Adding a second type of IPv6 address that is allocated geographically to allow greater topological aggregation (i.e. based on which city the network is in) will encourage use of IPv6 by making it easier for people to get IPv6 addresses. --Michael Dillon
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: 200 customer requirements for IPv6
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: 200 customer requirements for IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]